ABSTRACT
The occurrence of malignant tumor in proximity to an arthroplasty prosthesis has been a matter of debate since it was first reported in 1978. Upon considering the number of orthopedic implants used, the occurrence of malignancy is rare. Especially in case of angiosarcoma, only a few cases have been reported worldwide. In this case, we report an extremely rare case of angiosarcoma arising at the site of a revision total hip arthroplasty. A 69-year-old female had received total hip replacement on her left hip due to osteoarthritis 8 months ago. Four months later, she complained pain on her operated area, X-ray showed loosening of implanted cup on her left hip. Thereafter, erythematous and purpuric papules and nodules were developed and spread around on her left hip. Through the skin biopsy she was diagnosed with angiosarcoma, and then she died of a sharp deterioration. Herein, we report a rare case of angiosarcoma occurred after total hip replacement with a review of the literature.
ABSTRACT
The occurrence of malignant tumor in proximity to an arthroplasty prosthesis has been a matter of debate since it was first reported in 1978. Upon considering the number of orthopedic implants used, the occurrence of malignancy is rare. Especially in case of angiosarcoma, only a few cases have been reported worldwide. In this case, we report an extremely rare case of angiosarcoma arising at the site of a revision total hip arthroplasty. A 69-year-old female had received total hip replacement on her left hip due to osteoarthritis 8 months ago. Four months later, she complained pain on her operated area, X-ray showed loosening of implanted cup on her left hip. Thereafter, erythematous and purpuric papules and nodules were developed and spread around on her left hip. Through the skin biopsy she was diagnosed with angiosarcoma, and then she died of a sharp deterioration. Herein, we report a rare case of angiosarcoma occurred after total hip replacement with a review of the literature.
ABSTRACT
Syringomas are common benign neoplasms that are derived from the intradermal eccrine duct and frequently manifest in adult females as 1~3-mm flesh-colored papules on the face, especially on the lower eyelid. There are two hypotheses about their pathogenesis: ductal obstruction by keratin plugs and reactive eccrine proliferation following an inflammatory condition. The patient was a 66-year-old man with multiple erythematous papules and nodules on both periorbital areas after 7-day sorafenib (Nexavar®) treatment. A skin biopsy of the Rt. periorbital lesion revealed multiple cysts and tadpole-shaped tubular structures in the dermal layer. Inflammatory cell infiltration was seen throughout the dermis. Based on the clinical features and histological findings, we diagnosed the patient with syringoma-like eccrine duct proliferation. The indications for and use of Sorafenib have increased recently. Although sorafenib-associated cutaneous side effects have increased, no cases of syringoma-like eccrine duct proliferation have been reported to date. Here we report a case of sorafenib-induced syringoma-like eccrine duct proliferation in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Biopsy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Dermis , Eyelids , Skin , SyringomaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Currently, physicians from different medical specialties treat patients' skin conditions, especially for cosmetic purposes. Although diagnosis and treatment made by non-dermatologists may sometimes be improper, many patients are unable to distinguish a non-dermatologist from a dermatologist. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate public's perception of dermatologists. METHODS: A total of 515 participants completed the online survey. The questionnaire consisted of three main parts: information regarding respondents, experience of dermatological treatments, and awareness of skin treatments performed by dermatologists, and by medical specialties. RESULTS: Overall, 48% of respondents were unable to distinguish a dermatologist from a non-dermatologist; however, 93% of respondents responded that they were willing to visit a dermatologist for treatment. A fair number of respondents identified dermatologists by signboards, professional biographies, and licenses. However, some non-dermatologists' signboards and biographies were considered misleading and confused patients. CONCLUSION: Many patients intend to visit a dermatologist for their dermatological treatments. However, half could not distinguish dermatologists from non-dermatologists. For this reason, we underline the importance of increasing public awareness of the dermatologist's expertise in helping patients in choosing their clinics.
Subject(s)
Humans , Diagnosis , Licensure , Skin , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Kerion celsi is an inflammatory infection, caused by a vigorous T-cell mediated host response to the dermatophyte infection. In the case of severe inflammation, it can be misdiagnosed as other disease like cellulitis, impetigo, furuncle and epidermal cyst. Microsporum(M.) canis is most likely transmitted by contact of animal hosts such as cats and dogs with humans. We report the 75-year-old female who presented two months history of tender erythematous scaly plaques with pustules, crusts on right scalp area. At first, from the histopathologic findings of the lesion, the patient was diagnosed epidermal cyst because of cyst-like structure in mid-dermis. But the fungal culture revealed M. canis as the causative fungus. Herein we report a educational case of kerion celsi mistaken for ruptured epidermal cyst.